Cistanche Tubulosa Extract
Cistanche Tubulosa Extract
Total Glycosides 10%–85% | Echinacoside 1%–80% | Acteoside 1%–98%
Specification-led botanical extract
- Botanical name: Cistanche tubulosa (Schenk) Wight
- Plant part: Fleshy stem
- Appearance: Brown fine powder
- Formats: Extract powder with specification-dependent active-marker levels
- Solubility: Grade dependent; confirm against the selected specification and sample
What’s Cistanche Tubulosa Extract?
Cistanche tubulosa is a desert plant used in traditional botanical preparations. Commercial extracts are commonly differentiated by total glycosides and marker compounds such as echinacoside and acteoside.
Herbify can help customers compare specification-led grades. Botanical identity, plant part, extraction solvent, extract ratio, marker specification, analytical method, residual solvents, contaminants, solubility and storage requirements should be confirmed against the selected grade and current batch documentation.
Key Features & Applications
- Suitable for capsules, tablets, sachets, botanical blends and specification-led formulation projects, subject to regulatory suitability.
- Grades can be compared by total glycosides, echinacoside, acteoside, extract ratio, carrier system and analytical method.
- Confirm colour, taste, hygroscopicity, flow, compressibility and dispersion during formulation trials.
- Marker percentages are specification targets, not evidence of finished-product efficacy.
- Samples, specifications, certificates of analysis and available supporting documents can be requested for technical review.
Regulatory note: Ingredient status, permitted use and any health or therapeutic claims depend on the final product, dose, formulation and destination market. Confirm current Australian requirements and obtain appropriate regulatory advice before commercial use.
Documentation & Enquiries
For grade comparison, request the current specification and batch COA together with the botanical identity, plant part, extraction solvent, extract ratio, carrier or excipient declaration, marker assay and test method. Available support may also include TDS, SDS, microbiological limits, heavy metals, pesticides and residual-solvent information, subject to the selected grade.
Total glycosides, echinacoside and acteoside are different specification measures and should not be compared without the analytical method and calculation basis. Review our COA reading guide and extract ratio versus standardised extract guide before selecting a grade.
For a useful response, provide your intended application, target marker and method, dosage form, estimated annual volume, destination market and required documents. Request specification, COA or sample.
FAQ
Is an 85% total-glycosides grade automatically stronger than an echinacoside-standardised grade?
No. These are different specification systems. Compare the defined analyte, analytical method, calculation basis, extraction process and intended formulation rather than percentages alone.Are echinacoside and acteoside interchangeable markers?
No. They are distinct compounds and should be specified and tested separately.What should a buyer confirm before requesting a sample?
Confirm the botanical identity, plant part, target marker and method, extract ratio, carrier, solvent system, application, required documents and expected commercial volume.Can Herbify provide a sample and bulk quotation?
Samples and quotations can be coordinated for qualified B2B projects after the intended application and required specification are confirmed.
























